| Beekeeping in Barbados
- Preliminary Status Assessment by Tomas Mozer SPONSORED BY FAVACA/FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTEERS - DECEMBER, 2003 |
BACKGROUND
The detection in early 2003 of Varroa destructor, a
parasitic mite of the honey bee (Apis mellifera), prompted a request from
the Barbados Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development for technical
assistance to advise Ministry entomologist Ian Gibbs and commercial
beekeeper Rudy Gibson. Although only recently identified in Barbados,
apparent losses of domestic bee hives and wild feral colonies had become
epidemic since starting in approximately 2000, according to anecdotal
reports. It is estimated that about 75% of the honeybee population on the
island was destroyed, an effect commonly associated with Varroa
introductions worldwide along with the resulting lowered honey production as
well as diminished pollination potential for agricultural crops.
FINDINGS
A mite survey was conducted during the consultant’s Dec.6-15 visit,
inspecting over 50 beehives in the parishes of Christ Church, St. Michael
and St. Andrew and also examining wild/feral colonies in Bridgetown. Varroa
was found in all locations indicating widespread distribution, however the
phoretic infestation levels in samples analyzed in the laboratory were low
(<5%) and the overall conditions of survivors suggests that host/parasite
coevolution has progressed from the acute/virulent phase to the
chronic/tolerant stage. Given that observed colony pathologies in the field
were relatively minor in scope (chalkbrood/sacbrood, paralysis/deformed
wings) for what is termed “parasitic mite syndrome”, the survival rates of
both domestic and feral populations appear to be on the rebound. Some
colonies demonstrated considerable defensive behaviour, which may be related
to particular environmental stresses (such as drought/nectar dearth) and/or
stock genetics issues (including introgression/mongrelization).
ACTIONS
Mitigation by using the miticide Apistan (fluvalinate) strips provided by the Ministry was enacted by the beekeeper at this time as a prophylactic measure, although mite levels may be below usual action thresholds associated with integrated pest management. One apiary was to be left untreated as a comparative test in order to asses natural susceptibility of surviving stocks, with the intent that non-chemical control strategies be employed in the future to prevent development of pesticide dependence/resistance/contamination.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Suggest continued regular monitoring of varroa levels in domestic/feral bee populations to attempt identification of effective integrated pest management methods, including screening for genetic diversity and disease prevalence as well as exotic pest introductions. The development of apicultural training programs for both new/old beekeepers and public service personnel should be a priority for government and international agencies, with the hope of rebuilding the industry.